Sharing is doing...

Dec 4, 2013

America’s Loss is the World’s Gain

Vivek Wadhwa
Fellow, Arthur & Toni Rembe Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University


Recently, President Obama made a startling concession to the Republican Party: that he would accept a piecemeal approach to overhauling America’s immigration system. "If they want to chop that thing up into five pieces, as long as all five pieces get done, I don't care what it looks like", Mr. Obama said.

This is startling because, for the past few years, Democratic Party leaders have insisted on an all-or-nothing approach to immigration. They would not agree to increase the numbers of visas for skilled workers unless the Republicans agreed to legalize the more than 10 million immigrants who are in the country without documentation. The Republicans refused to provide “amnesty” to the unskilled, so the Democrats let the skilled immigrants — and U.S. competitiveness — suffer. This is no different from the juvenile behavior you see in other democracies.

The President realizes the political reality and is trying to get whatever he can through the system. But it is unlikely that he will have any success on immigration, because House leaders are still reeling from their loss on the fiscal shutdown and will not hand the President any kind of political victory.

This is bad for the U.S. but is good news for countries such as India, China, and Brazil. That’s because the U.S. has been giving these countries an unintended gift: highly educated and skilled workers with experience in U.S. markets. It has been sending would-be immigrants back home, exporting its competitive edge.

Immigrants have always given America its economic advantage. Skilled immigrants made it into a technology superpower. Wave after wave came to America’s shores and brought with them their education, knowledge of global markets, and determination to achieve success. They made the natives think smarter and work harder and contributed to practically all of its technology breakthroughs.



Over the past three decades, immigrants have been fuelling the majority of Silicon Valley’s innovation and growth. My research team at Duke, Harvard, and UC-Berkeley documented that from 1995 to 2005, immigrants founded 52% of Silicon Valley startups, and 25% of startups nationwide (read this research paper). They contributed to 72% of the WIPO patents filed by Qualcomm, 65% of those by Merck, 64% of General Electric, and 60% of Cisco Systems. Incredibly, 40% of the international patent applications filed by the U.S. Government also had foreign-national authors (more data here).

Indians thrive in Silicon Valley. They have founded 33.2% of its immigrant-founded startups—more than immigrants from any other ten countries combined have, including China, the U.K., Canada, Germany, Israel, and Russia. Indians also co-author 13.7% of America’s global patents.

Despite this amazing contribution, the U.S. is allowing itself to bleed competitiveness. It admits hundreds of thousands of students and workers on H1-B visas, but it doesn’t provide enough permanent-resident visas to let these skilled foreigners make the U.S. their new home. The result is that there are more than a million skilled immigrants and their families stuck in “immigration limbo”. The U.S. only issues about 140,000 permanent-resident visas to educated and skilled workers per year, and there is a 7% per-country limit. This means that applicants from high-population countries such as India, China, and Brazil get the same numbers of visas as those from Bhutan and Mauritius do: about 10,000. It takes decades for people from these countries to become permanent residents. While they wait, they are generally stuck in the same position with the same employer.

I explained the reverse brain drain that is in progress and the consequences of this in my book The Immigrant Exodus: Why America Is Losing the Global Race to Capture Entrepreneurial Talent. In a nutshell, because of improving opportunities in countries such India, China, and Brazil — and out of frustration with the delay in visa processing — the tide has turned. Skilled workers are returning home in record numbers. In research that my group at Stanford completed recently, we found that the proportion of companies founded in Silicon Valley from 2006 to 2012 that had been founded by immigrants had fallen to 44%. This was not because immigrants had become less entrepreneurial, but because they could not get the visas necessary for starting companies.

America’s loss has been a huge gain for other countries. If you visit any top Chinese research lab, you will find returnees from the U.S. at their helm. The tech centers of both India and China are growing rapidly with the infusion of Silicon Valley-trained talent. These returnees are bringing America’s best practices and entrepreneurial culture back home with them.

American leaders are well aware of the damage that the brain drain is doing to U.S. competitiveness. The President has cited my research in his speeches, and I have been asked to testify to both the House and Senate. The problem is that in addition to the issue of amnesty, there is also a xenophobic element in the U.S. that wants to keep foreigners out. And there are technology workers prevented from getting jobs by their location, age, or skills. They are all rallying against immigrants and complicating the factional battles in Congress. This is creating the stalemate.

So America’s loss is the world’s gain.

You can also follow me on Twitter and read more of my articles on my website: www.wadhwa.com.

Nov 28, 2013

100 Million to Have Insurance Canceled by Obamacare!



Comments:

"This is was manufactured by the press.The roll out of the ACA is how these roll outs happen, they start out badly and then become indispensable as the bugs are worked out and it starts doing what it is supposed to do.The press spoiled by instant success by the supposed success of the two wars against Iraq and the smoothness of the American pull out last year expect everything to run well.It does not help that Fox News is the propaganda arm of the GOP bent on destroying the president and the Democratic party."

"+Drew Coulter I found your source, it's a CBS poll. You're being misleading. A mere twelve percent of Democrats favor repeal. Seventy-two percent favor amending the law. And I think you got this from a really shit place without checking it, because 72+12=84. That rounds to 80, not 70. You wouldn't have done that if you saw the source. I would suggest you learn to check internet rumours."

"+James Fraser I agree with that.  I never thought a big percentage of Democrats wanted to repeal the law.  The problem is, the way the law is structured its hard to amend it.  Delaying or undoing some things may seem like a good idea, but other parts of the law depend on those things so rates stay low or for insurance companies to not go bankrupt.  Amending the law in a meaningful way starts to unravel everything, which is a big reason why the Democratic leadership right now isn't offering anything substantial in terms of relief."

"All insurance companies change their plan yearly so there is no way for anyone to have a pre-Obamacare 'grandfather' insurance plan.... and the people who wrote Obama HC knew it.
 Also 63% of employer offered insurance plans will be changed (thus lose their current plans) but may offer a new plan costing 20% to 100% for those employees. The bottle line is Democrats were deceitful with their talking points."
 

Nov 6, 2013

SOMETHING FROM NOTHING ? [OFFICIAL] Richard Dawkins & Lawrence Krauss [H...

Uploaded on Feb 12, 2012
Join critically-acclaimed author and evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins and world-renowned theoretical physicist and author Lawrence Krauss as they discuss biology, cosmology, religion, and a host of other topics.

The authors will also discuss their new books. Dawkins recently published The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's Really True, an exploration of the magic of discovery embodied in the practice of science. Written for all age groups, the book moves forward from historical examples of supernatural explanations of natural phenomena to focus on the actual science behind how the world works.

Krauss's latest book, A Universe from Nothing: Why There is Something Rather than Nothing, explains the scientific advances that provide insight into how the universe formed. Krauss tackles the age-old assumption that something cannot arise from nothing by arguing that not only can something arise from nothing, but something will always arise from nothing.

Founded in 2008, the ASU Origins Project is a university-wide transdisciplinary initiative aimed at facilitating cutting edge research and inquiry about origins questions, enhancing public science literacy, and improving science education. Since its inception, the Origins Project has brought the world's leading scientists, including Nobel Prize winners, to Tempe to explore origins questions. The Origins Project has hosted workshops and public events that have focused on questions as fundamental as the origin of the universe, how life began, the origins of human uniqueness, and the origins of morality.

'Distasteful and offensive': Twin Towers costumes spark outrage


SWNS.com
Amber Langford, left, and Annie Collinge, right, reportedly said their 9/11-themed costumes were "not intended as a joke."

LONDON -- Two British teens have sparked outrage after dressing up for Halloween as the Twin Towers during the 9/11 attacks.

The costumes were labeled "South Tower" and "North Tower" and included explosions, planes, and people jumping out of the buildings, The Sun newspaper reported. The tabloid's front-page headline on Wednesday read "Towering Stupidity."
The 19-year-old students also wore American flags planted among more wreckage on their heads.

They reportedly received £150 ($240) for winning the "best dressed" competition at a Halloween party at Rosies nightclub in Chester, England.

The newspaper named the pair as Amber Langford, a biology student whose father is reportedly a retired pilot, and criminology student Annie Collinge.

John Feal, president of New York-based 9/11 victims’ organization The FealGood Foundation, described the incident aas "shameful."
Str / REUTERS
See images from the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
"The insensitivity level for this act of ignorance is topped by none. As for the nightclub who allowed it, sponsored it and endorsed it, shame on you," Feal told The Sun.

Almost 3,000 people died in the al-Qaeda attacks on September 11, 2001, including 67 U.K. citizens.
The teens apologized "if any offence was caused."

In a statement to the Sun, they added: "The idea was to depict a serious, modern-day horror that happened in our lifetime and was not intended as a joke."

A spokeswoman for the Stonegate Pub Company, which runs Rosies nightclub, added: "We are extremely concerned that an award was made to two women dressed in a distasteful and offensive manner."

Oct 20, 2013

Did The Obama Administration Give $900 million to Hamas?

The Obama administration offered "$900 million to Hamas, a recognized terrorist organization, to rebuild Gaza."

 

Republican National Committee claims Obama administration offered $900 million to Hamas to rebuild Gaza

 

The Republican National Committee recently put out a questionnaire called the "2009 Obama Agenda Survey" in which it asks Republicans to rate their agreement or disagreement with a number of so-called Obama administration positions.

But it looks to us more like a push poll, a political technique in which the questions are written in a way that aims to convince the respondent of a particular political position. In other words, they are political statements masquerading as questions.

We decided to fact-check two "questions" from the survey, and you'll see what we mean. 

One is an allegation that the Obama administration has ordered a new initiative that requires FBI agents to read Miranda Rights to high-value terrorist detainees captured on the battlefield. We deal with that one in another Truth-O-Meter ruling . 

Here, we address the GOP question, "Do you support the Obama administration’s decision to offer $900 million to Hamas, a recognized terrorist organization, to rebuild Gaza?"

As you can see, built into the "question" is a statement of fact, that the Obama administration offered $900 million to Hamas to rebuild Gaza.

During a trip to Egypt in early March 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that the United States intends to provide $900 million for humanitarian, economic and security assistance for the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinian people.

Here's how that money would be split: $200 million to the Palestinian Authority to address part of its 2009 budget shortfall; $400 million "to help the Palestinian Authority solidify economic and institutional reforms in the West Bank"; and $300 million in humanitarian aid for Gaza following January's 22-day violent conflict between Israel and the Islamic militant group Hamas. The humanitarian aid to Gaza would be distributed primarily through U.N. agencies and nongovernmental organizations. The strategy, according to State Department officials, was to specifically make sure the money did not go to Hamas.

In testimony before the Senate Appropriations Committee on April 30, Clinton assured that disbursement of the money "will be implemented with stringent requirements to prevent aid from being diverted into the wrong hands."

Translation: Hamas.
Some have argued, however, that the aid, while not going directly to Hamas, would still benefit them.
"Whatever officials in Washington might intend, the Obama administration's new Gaza aid package is likely to turn out to be a financial boon for Hamas, which wields actual physical control over the places the aid is destined to go," wrote Ilan Berman, vice president for foreign policy at the American Foreign Policy Council, in an April commentary distributed by Tribune Media Services.

Steven A. Cook, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Council on Foreign Relations and an expert in U.S.-Middle East policy, said there are legitimate concerns about aid ending up in the hands of Hamas. The problem, he said, is that supposed nongovernmental groups that purport not to have ties with Hamas sometimes do.

"We have yet to devise a foolproof system to ensure that money doesn't bleed out," Cook said.
Still, he said, it's a wild distortion to claim that the United States has offered Hamas $900 million. First of all, most of the $900 million is going to the West Bank, not Gaza. And while some of the humanitarian aid disbursed through U.N. and other nongovernmental agencies could "bleed out" to Hamas unintentionally, that's far different from giving money directly to Hamas.

Not only that, but the claim that the money would be used to "rebuild" Gaza after January's 22-day violent conflict between Israel and the Islamic militant group Hamas is also misleading. The money to Gaza is for humanitarian aid — food, medicine, repairing damaged infrastructure, removing rubble, etc. It is specifically not for reconstruction, he said, as Israel was concerned that reconstruction money might be used to build tunnels, weapons factories or the like.

"I'd give this one a D-minus," Cook said of the GOP claim. 

We agree that it's possible that even with safeguards, some of the humanitarian money could wind up in the hands of Hamas.

But when you read the GOP survey, you are left with the impression that the U.S. government intends to write a big, fat $900 million check that says "Pay to the order of Hamas." To the contrary, Washington is taking steps to try to specifically make sure none of that money winds up in the hands of Hamas. We also note that only $300 million of the $900 million is even going to Gaza, for humanitarian aid. And the money is specifically not to be used for reconstruction. It is limited to humanitarian aid — food, medicine, that kind of thing. So the GOP is wrong on that point too.

We rule the RNC's Hamas claim to be False.

Google

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...