To: Dennis
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 11:03 AM
Subject: The perversion of the Truth
As
usual the Liberal media has taken the TRUTH and perverted it to fit
their own ignorance. In their condemnation of Phil Roberts' comments on
homosexuality, particularly male homosexuality, the left has
once again tried to fit Jesus into their own concept of an all loving
and all accepting liberal puffball icon. They have compared Roberts'
statement to those of the new POPE, who is reported to have said, "who
am I to judge." when asked about homosexuals
in the clergy. The only problem is, that isn't what he said. What he
actually said was: "Who
am I to judge a gay person of goodwill who seeks the Lord?" the pontiff said, speaking in Italian. "You
can't marginalize these people."
The
conditional part of the phrase is: who seeks the lord. In other words,
seeks to follow the teaching of Jesus Christ. For Christ Himself said:
Jon
"As usual the CONSERVATIVE media has taken the TRUTH and perverted it to fit their own ignorance."
It works both ways and always has.
Your side, your agenda, your ideology, isn't better than the 'other side' it simply lacks agreement and remains stagnant in the limbo of disagreement.
Jon, you need to research this book you're quoting. It isn't holy, it is a manuscript written by men.
Blatantly and apparently on base discrimination.
-Dennis
From: Jon H.
To: Dennis
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 12:52 PM
Subject: RE: The perversion of the Truth
As I said. The Truth is, if you don't agree with Christ's teachings, don't follow him, but don't try to rewrite what his teachings are. There is no conservative perverted truth in this. If there is, point it out like I did.
That
is you opinion, which seeks to reconcile all the discord in the world. I
can understand you wanting to do that considering your upbringing. But
the truth is not
all things are profitable. If you are correct that it's all a matter of
just singing cumbaya and eating marshmallows with other people, great.
But if you are wrong and there are standards that GOD expects man to
adhere too, you in for a bad time.
Luke 6:46
New King James Version (NKJV)
46 “But
why do you call Me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and not do the things which I say?
Seeking
the Lord means adhering to
his word. But in the fuzzy headed brain of feel good liberals, the POPE
words mean, GAY IS A OK! Once again liberals are attempting to
transform reality into to their own contorted version.To better
understand their confusion, read the following article.
Furthermore, religious morals that deny the legitimacy of homosexuality is not bigotry. But forcing everyone to accept your perversion by law and force, is!
The Truth is, if you don't agree with Christ's teachings, don't follow him, but don't try to rewrite what his teachings are.
Furthermore, religious morals that deny the legitimacy of homosexuality is not bigotry. But forcing everyone to accept your perversion by law and force, is!
The Truth is, if you don't agree with Christ's teachings, don't follow him, but don't try to rewrite what his teachings are.
Jon
_______________________________
From: Dennis
To: Jon H. <********@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:36:06 -0800
Subject: Re: The perversion of the Truth
"As usual the CONSERVATIVE media has taken the TRUTH and perverted it to fit their own ignorance."
It works both ways and always has.
Your side, your agenda, your ideology, isn't better than the 'other side' it simply lacks agreement and remains stagnant in the limbo of disagreement.
Jon, you need to research this book you're quoting. It isn't holy, it is a manuscript written by men.
Blatantly and apparently on base discrimination.
-Dennis
_______________________________
From: Jon H.
To: Dennis
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 12:52 PM
Subject: RE: The perversion of the Truth
As I said. The Truth is, if you don't agree with Christ's teachings, don't follow him, but don't try to rewrite what his teachings are. There is no conservative perverted truth in this. If there is, point it out like I did.
Jon
_______________________________
From: Dennis
To: Jon H. <********@hotmail.com>
Sent:
12/19/2013 4:25 PM
Subject: RE: The perversion of the Truth
"That is you opinion, which seeks to reconcile all the discord in the world."
Its not my OPINION. It is research. Easily accessible research.
There
are no real teachings of Jesus. Just the hearsay of what presumably his
followers TOLD other people, then they wrote them down.
Jesus never wrote scripture, (another reason I think of him as a hippie) you have never seen words from Jesus, just the gossip.
Luke
was added to by the church because it didn't seem complete. Enoch was
left out of the canon. A pagan emperor was the 'decider' of what was
left in. The bible is redundant,
repetitive to the point of being redundant.
It is pointlessly violent, and incomplete as a book of morality.
You have been commanded to kill anyone asking you to worship any other god besides god. Not save, admonish, ignore. Kill.
Lot's daughters got him drunk and they both had his babies?!
In Genesis it says that "Giants walked the Earth"?
After Noah's flood the tower of Babel was being built 150yrs later?
Moses was only gone 40 days and his people started worshiping golden chattel? 40 days, that was all.
Men are living to be 500yrs old?
This is childish!
-Dennis
_______________________________
From: Jon H.
To: Dennis
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 4:44 PM
Subject: RE: The perversion of the Truth
Sent from my Windows Phone
Seriously, are you lecturing me on a book you haven't read?
To: Dennis
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 4:44 PM
Subject: RE: The perversion of the Truth
Where
have I been commanded to kill any one who worships another god show me
where I am commanded. As for Moses, and the people of Israel, that's.
You and me. Read to seek wisdom. Not facts
Sent from my Windows Phone
_______________________________
From: Dennis
To: Jon H.
Sent:
12/19/2013 7:10 PM
Subject:
Re: The perversion of the Truth
Seriously, are you lecturing me on a book you haven't read?
"If
your own full brother, or your son or daughter, or your beloved wife,
or you intimate friend, entices you secretly to serve other gods, whom
you and your fathers have
not known, gods of any other nations, near at hand or far away, from
one end of the earth to the other: do not yield to him or listen to him, nor
look with pity upon him, to spare or shield him, but kill him. Your
hand shall be the first raised to slay him; the rest of the people shall
join in with you. You shall stone him to death, because he sought to lead you astray from the Lord, your God, who brought you out of the
land of
Egypt, that place of slavery. And all
Israel, hearing of this, shall fear and never do such evil as this in your midst." (Deuteronomy
13:7-12 NAB)
-Dennis
_______________________________
From:
Jon H
To: Dennis
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 7:17 PM
Subject: RE: The perversion of the Truth
Sent from my Windows Phone
To: Dennis
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 7:17 PM
Subject: RE: The perversion of the Truth
I am not Jewish are you?
Sent from my Windows Phone
_______________________________
From: Dennis
To: Jon H.
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: The perversion of the Truth
To: Jon H.
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: The perversion of the Truth
Wait, what?
This is from your sacred book. Who granted you the right to pick and choose?
If you can decipher what is and isn't 'righteous' in the old testament, why can't you see the hubris in accepting the fallacies in the new testament?
And if fallacies exist in the book from he who is infallible, why is what you pick and choose holy?
Who gave you that ability?
Who gave the men who wrote the book the inability to make it the perfect word of god?
Let me add one more tidbit; we are all guilty based on this scripture I sent you.
We ALL walk around bowing to our technical god while reading our phone.
We supplicate ourselves to it, Jews included.
Jon, it isn't possible to live a life designed to be righteous from a book with poor design.
-Dennis
This is from your sacred book. Who granted you the right to pick and choose?
If you can decipher what is and isn't 'righteous' in the old testament, why can't you see the hubris in accepting the fallacies in the new testament?
And if fallacies exist in the book from he who is infallible, why is what you pick and choose holy?
Who gave you that ability?
Who gave the men who wrote the book the inability to make it the perfect word of god?
Let me add one more tidbit; we are all guilty based on this scripture I sent you.
We ALL walk around bowing to our technical god while reading our phone.
We supplicate ourselves to it, Jews included.
Jon, it isn't possible to live a life designed to be righteous from a book with poor design.
_______________________________
There was no follow up reply.....
_______________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment