Why did 9/11 occur? The search does not end until the truth is exposed and those that died are allowed to rest. We hold that the lies about Ground Zero are clearly evident and that all victims are created equal, even those forced to lie. Not every victim of September 11th, 2001 died during the collapsing of the twin towers; there are more victims being created everyday.
If
you want me to do more of these, please let me know in the comment
section. Thanks so much!! 500,000 views in 3 weeks. I'm blown away!
Thanks
for watching. If you like this vid, maybe you'll like some of my
others. If so, why not SUBSCRIBE and Share?*** Subscribe here: http://bit.ly/11rr1ln Like to hear your COMMENTS...I DO read 'em.
Executive
Order 12333 created an agreement between the CIA and Justice Department
(DEA) to look the other way on Government Drug Trafficking: http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo/eo-...
Michael C. Ruppert, Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly into the CIA's Highest Ranks, October 9, 2001, http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free...
Kevin R. Ryan, Mahmud Ahmed's itinerary from his Washington DC visit the week of 9/11, 911blogger.com, 11/27/2009, http://www.911blogger.com/node/21978
The
Ties That Bind, Descended from family business empires, six huge
business groups dominate the Japanese economy, Multinational Monitor,
October 1983 - http://multinationalmonitor.org/hyper...
Securacomm
Consulting Inc. v. Securacom Incorporated, United States Court of
Appeals for the Third Circuit, January 20, 1999, 49 U.S.P.Q.2d 1444; 166
F.3d 182, http://altlaw.org/v1/cases/1099498
Al-Qaida spent about $500,000 executing the 9/11 terror attacks. The U.S. government has spent up to $5 trillion fighting back. One expert estimated we're spending about $400 million per life saved.
In other words, for every dollar the bad guys spent, we lost 10 million.
And that's not even counting the money lost due to the economic slump
that followed. That, friends, is one hell of a return on an investment.
Also: The 9/11 attacks killed 2,996 people. The response has killed
224,475 and displaced another 7.8 million refugees.
Terrorism works. Now more than ever. That's right: I'm David Wong, and I'm here to endorse the effectiveness of terrorism. Buy my book.
And however effective terrorism might have been in the past, holy fuck
does it work in the era of mass communication -- the World Trade Center
attacks didn't happen once, they happened millions of times, as the
news replayed the terrible orange/black blooms of impact over, and over,
and over, and over. Amplifying the trauma, reverberating through the
culture until every nerve was rubbed raw, creating what would come to be
called the "Post-9/11 World." The sheer existence of that as an
everyday term says it all:
And as a result, a bad guy can now make the whole world stop dead in
its goddamned tracks with nothing more than a device built with about a
hundred bucks' worth of shit he got at Walmart. If you pick up a gun and
shoot six people at your office over a change in dress code, you'll be
gone from the front page of CNN by the next day. But build a crude bomb
and kill three people in the name of jihad while cameras are rolling?
You'll cause an entire city to go on lockdown, utterly dominate the
consciousness of a nation for months, and create scenes like this:
That's a video clip of camouflaged men with machine guns going house
by house in a Boston neighborhood after the marathon bombing. Some of
you watching that immediately thought, "Wait, the Army was just barging
into people's houses during the manhunt?"
Via PigMine4 "OK, soldiers, listen up! We need a 14-foot moat around the perimeter!"
Haha, don't be ridiculous. The military doesn't do that in America,
think about how weird that would be. No, those are police officers.
Via PigMine4 Now imagine being pulled over by this guy for speeding.
See? Says right on the back. That's what the police look like now. Because this is a Post-9/11 World.
Soon after that event, in which a couple of kids made bombs out of
black powder and pressure cookers, a random guy in New York Googled
"pressure cooker bomb," as you'd expect in the aftermath of a huge news
story about pressure cooker bombs. He was surprised to see the cops immediately show up at his house.
It turns out his employers were monitoring his searches and called the
police. And that, too, is part of our life now, because you can never be
too careful in a Post-9/11 World, when absolutely everything we do and
think revolves around avoiding terrorism, 24 hours a day.
And it didn't take long for people looking to take advantage to realize ...
#5. Apparently Anything Can Be Called "Terrorism"
Jupiterimages/liquidlibrary/Getty Images
Let's be clear: I was absolutely, completely for the "War on Terror"
in 2001. It seemed like the clearest-cut conflict in world history: the
modern, democratic world versus primitive fundamentalist savages who
thought they could rewind the clock on civilization by a thousand years
if they blew up enough innocent children. My liberal friends who
recoiled at the idea of a war on terror or asked things like "But how do we know when it's over?"
seemed to be either terrifyingly oblivious or outright evil. "You're
supposed to be progressive, but you're standing up for murderous
medieval theocrats who consider women to be cattle? Grow some balls!"
Then, a weird thing happened. While 9/11 was fresh in our minds, on
TV they started showing a PSA saying that anyone who bought or sold
marijuana was also a terrorist:
Well ... OK. So the idea is that drug money funds terrorist groups
indirectly? Sounds kind of shaky, but hey, you can never be too careful
in a Post-9/11 World!
Darrin Klimek/Digital Vision/Getty Images "Hey! What did I tell you kids about doing terrorism inside the house?!"
And here's the thing: Half of you reading this are saying, "Sure, it's silly to call drug dealers terrorists, but have you read about the evil shit Monsanto does to poor farmers? They really are
terrorists!" Exactly! Because we're too busy deciding which bad people
we want to call terrorists, we never stop to consider whether or not
it's become a meaningless label. After all, we can't just stop using the
label against the people we hate, otherwise they might use it against us.
Meanwhile, we kind of lost track of the fact that the thing we were
originally calling terrorism -- extremists blowing the shit out of large
numbers of innocent people -- had kind of stopped happening. Because as
it turned out ...
#4. It's Actually Really Hard to Pull Off a Large-Scale Terror Attack
Hemera Technologies/AbleStock.com
If on September 12, 2001, you had predicted that we'd make it to 2013
with no further large-scale terror attacks, I'd have said you had your
goddamned head in the sand. "Don't you know we're in the middle of an
epic clash of civilizations, and either radical Islam or Western
civilization itself will be wiped from the Earth forever? This shit is
going to end in a mushroom cloud, bitch!"
After all, the only thing between a terrorist and a massive body
count is the will to do it -- and 9/11 proved they have the will. Put
some C4 in a backpack, go to a concert, boom -- 500 dead. Pack a
car full of fertilizer, drive it into the lobby of an office building
-- bang, 5,000 bodies in a collapsed building. This was the new reality,
I thought -- the USA had become Palestine. Bombings would be weekly
news, soldiers would stand at the entrance of the Mall of America with
M4 rifles.
Hemera Technologies/AbleStock.com No one would make fun of mall security ever again.
Instead, it's been just small-scale, bullshit attempts, usually by
fucktards more likely to blow themselves to bits before they even leave
the safe house. Their primary source for bomb-making materials is
undercover ATF agents.
Right now some of you are saying, "Uh, I hate to break the news to you, asshole, but you just admitted
that the nation was brought to a standstill by the horror of the Boston
Marathon bombing." Sure, but the sheer fact that we're able to regard
the deaths of three people and the wounding of dozens more as a massive
event rather than "the 10th largest bombing of the month" is the point
-- you get twice as many murder victims in an average weekend of Chicago gang violence.
The target of the Boston bombers was a dense crowd of 500,000 people standing shoulder to shoulder
-- why were there three deaths instead of 300, or 3,000? Because it's
really fucking hard to carry out a terror attack. The bombers didn't
have any actual bomb-making materials -- no C4, no TNT, no truck full of
ammonium nitrate. Instead they had off-the-shelf cookware and what
appeared to be black powder they scraped from some fireworks.
Photodisc/Photodisc/Getty Images I assume they said "WHEEEE!" a lot while making them.
The truth is that law enforcement has done a fantastic job of
monitoring the sale of black market bomb-making materials (the
transatlantic bombers were being watched by more than a thousand agents
-- they only got as far as buying the components before police swept
in). See, we've been fooled by action movies, where any mobster can come
up with a block of plastic explosive to stick under the car of a
snitch. Hell, the Joker can buy entire buildings full of explosive
liquids without anyone noticing. In the real world, it turns out that
no, you can't really order large quantities of anything that goes "boom"
without the government kicking down your door five minutes later.
Photos.com "Sir, step away from the Google search bar!"
Pulling off an effective attack means a lot of things have to go
right. It takes money, skill, intelligence, discipline, and training.
The enemy, as it turns out, is always short of some or all of those
things. They're usually poor, uneducated, stupid people who are deeply
unsatisfying to capture or kill. Which brings me to the next point ...
