Wikileaks, 9/11 and the Bill of Rights

"I presume this is in regards to the push by congress to make the internet a gov't ruled affair?

Get this... see if you can wrap your head around it.... there is speculation that Wikileaks is run by the CIA. Think about it... they create it,... set up a big fiasco... leak a bunch of really stupid stuff that clearly isn't all that mind blowing and blow it up to huge proportions via the web. Then they put some mysterious kid soldier in jail for leaking info to Wikileaks and 8 months later, nobody has seen him even once. They claim he is in extreme solitary getting 1 hour of daylight each day. No charges have been pressed to date. Does this person even exist? Hmmm... anyways... what would be gained by such an event happening? Well, it would make the vast majority of people say "well, yeah... I guess with stuff happening like that Wikileaks thing it makes sense to rule the web, okay... I wont make as big a fuss over it then".

It stands to reason that just like 9/11, the government has manipulated the public with an incident to bend their simple believing minds in their favor.

I for one actually lean towards this theory and will be very skeptical of Wikileaks for some time until they blow the lid off something major. And even then, I will be questioning the possibilities of why that story exists."

Scott Ewing Blog: http://myindystudio.blogspot.com/

Top CIA official confesses order to forge Iraq-9/11 letter came on White House stationery

John Byrne
Published: Friday August 8, 2008

In damning transcript, ex-CIA official says Cheney likely ordered letter linking Hussein to 9/11 attacks

A forged letter linking Saddam Hussein to the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks was ordered on White House stationery and probably came from the office of Vice President Dick Cheney, according to a new transcript of a conversation with the Central Intelligence Agency's former Deputy Chief of Clandestine Operations Robert Richer.

The transcript was posted Friday by author Ron Suskind of an interview conducted in June. It comes on the heels of denials by both the White House and Richer of a claim Suskind made in his new book, The Way of The World. The book was leaked to Politico's Mike Allen on Monday, and released Tuesday.

On Tuesday, the White House released a statement on Richer's behalf. In it, Richer declared, "I never received direction from George Tenet or anyone else in my chain of command to fabricate a document ... as outlined in Mr. Suskind's book."

The denial, however, directly contradicts Richer's own remarks in the transcript.

"Now this is from the Vice President's Office is how you remembered it--not from the president?" Suskind asked.

"No, no, no," Richer replied, according to the transcript. "What I remember is George [Tenet] saying, 'we got this from'--basically, from what George said was 'downtown.'"

"Which is the White House?" Suskind asked.

"Yes," Richer said. "But he did not--in my memory--never said president, vice president, or NSC. Okay? But now--he may have hinted--just by the way he said it, it would have--cause almost all that stuff came from one place only: Scooter Libby and the shop around the vice president."

"But he didn't say that specifically," Richer added. "I would naturally--I would probably stand on my, basically, my reputation and say it came from the vice president."

"But there wasn't anything in the writing that you remember saying the vice president," Suskind continued.

"Nope," Richer said.

"It just had the White House stationery."

"Exactly right."

Later, Richer added, "You know, if you've ever seen the vice president's stationery, it's on the White House letterhead. It may have said OVP (Office of the Vice President). I don't remember that, so I don't want to mislead you."

Full article: The Raw Story

“Loose Change Final Cut” on Google Video

We here at Louder Than Words and Alex Jones Productions are proud to officially release “Loose Change Final Cut” on Google Video in the highest quality possible. Encouraging people to copy these films and hand them out, as well as hold screenings in Coffee Houses and Churches was a good start, but has not been enough in the past.

Our success in spreading awareness about the truth behind September 11th, 2001 is in large part with our ability to share our films freely through internet. We are hoping that all of you who have not seen the Final Cut will not only watch it, but email it to everyone you know, embed it on your Myspace or personal website, blog it, and post it on forums worldwide.

With the former Italian President saying it is well known within the intelligence community that 9/11 was a CIA and Mossad Op, and the Prime Minister of Japan and his cabinet being questioned about Insider Trading and the implosion of World Trade Center 7 by the opposition party, global interest in 9/11 truth is exploding.

If you decide today to share this information with everyone, family members may finally recieve answers to their many questions, and those who were criminally complicit may be tried and exposed. Its as easy as sending a link folks. Loose Change Final Cut puts the official government fable of 9/11 to rest, it truly is the nail in the coffin if you decide to be the hand that holds the hammer.

LCFC is available in high-quality at www.prisonplanet.com and www.loosechange911.com.

How the End Began 6: Cheney, Bin Laden, and the CIA

"9/11 is not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.
—FBI agent Rex Tomb, June 6, 2006
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/...



"We've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming."
—Dick Cheney, "Interview of the Vice President by Tony Snow", March 29, 2006
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releas...

"I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks.
—Usama bin Laden, CNN, "Bin Laden says he wasn't behind attacks," September 17, 2001
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL34bu...
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16...

QUESTION: "Mr President, in your speeches, you rarely mention Osama Bin Laden. Why is that?"
GEORGE BUSH JR: "I don't know where he is. I just don't spend that much time on him."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztKKuB...

QUESTION: "But Osama bin Laden is the one that — you keep talking about his lieutenants, and, yes, they are very important, but Osama bin Laden was the mastermind of 9/11..."
DANA PERINO: "No, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was the mastermind of 9/11, and hes sitting in jail right now."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gwb2E...

"9/11 is not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.
—FBI agent Rex Tomb, June 6, 2006
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/...

"The goal has never been to get Bin Laden."
—General Richard Myers, chairman, US Joint Chiefs of Staff
http://www.myspace.com/911pressfortruth

http://profcomp.thaiddns.com/board/ph...
www.mackwhite.com/northwoods.html

OPERATION NORTHWOODS - the signed confession by US Govt for perping terrorist attacks in USA
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/200...
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=926...
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/N...

The Bill of Rights

by Howard Zinn, 1991
from the Zinn Reader, Seven Stories Press

A few years back, a man high up in the CIA named Ray Cline was asked if the CIA, by its surveillance of protest organizations in the United States, was violating the free speech provision of the First Amendment.

He smiled and said: "It's only an Amendment."

And when it was disclosed that the FBI was violating citizens' rights repeatedly, a high official of the FBI was asked if anybody in the FBI questioned the legality of what they were doing.

He replied: "No, we never gave it a thought."

We clearly cannot expect the Bill of Rights to be defended by government officials. So it will have to be defended by the people.

If you do a bit of research into the origins of the Bill of Rights- and I had to do some because it is a job requirement of the historical profession-you will find that when the new government of the United States adopted the Bill of Rights in 1791, it did not do so with enthusiasm. The Bill of Rights was a political tool to quiet down critics of the Constitution. A Bill of Rights on paper comforts people. You don't have to take it seriously.

Like that CIA man, you can smile, and say, they're only Amendments.

Full article: http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/BillRights_ZR.html

The Problem is Civil Obedience: http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/CivilObedience_ZR.html